I know living in Denver this is a controversial take, but I like to be objective about things. Yes the Broncos are popular here as the home team, but ever since he was inducted last year, I can't help but have recurring "What the fuck?" thoughts as football season nears. Yes, Terrell Davis was an elite running back, and yes he had a 2,000 yard rushing season, but to me, he did not have a Hall of Fame CAREER. Career being the key point (as if you couldn't tell by the caps lock). What got me thinking about this was a
Barstool Sports Blog written about how Corey Dillon was making a case for the hall.
That blogger thinks Davis belongs in the Hall, but looking at his career stats, I just don't get why he got the call:
His heyday was from 1995 - 1998. Then injuries prevented him from playing in more than 8 games from 1999-2001. Yes he was great for those four years, but is four years really enough for a running back to qualify for the Hall? I know there's no set criteria and running backs tend to have a shorter shelf life, but for comparison's sake, let's look at Corey Dillon's stats:

As you can see, Corey Dillon was relevant for a longer period of time. What helps Davis' case is that he played on the Broncos and won 2 Super Bowls. Corey Dillon was banished to the fucking Cincinnati Bengals where he was able to churn out yards despite the team sucking ass. Then he goes to the Pats and wins a super bowl and establishes a career high in rushing yards (1,635). That's pretty impressive when you consider he did that in his 8th year in the league...which also happens to be right around the time he turned 30, the magical age where running backs fall off a cliff, and Dillon wasn't immune to that. By comparison, Davis hit 2,000 yards in his 4th year, then was never heard from again.
Another comparison of a guy who had a similar flash of brilliance is Priest Holmes. Here are his stats:
Dude was a fantasy stud from 2001 - 2003. Not only did he rush for over 1,400 yards each of those years, he was also a terror receiving out of the backfield:
He had three straight years with over 2,000 yards from scrimmage, compared to two by Davis (here are his receiving numbers):
Do I think Holmes belongs in the Hall of Fame? Fuck no. For the same reason I don't think Davis belongs there. Of these three backs, Corey Dillon is the most deserving, but he probably doesn't get there because he was a surly guy from all those years of being in Cincinnati, meanwhile, Davis smiles a lot, is cool with the media, and
dropped a shit ton of money at strips clubs in Atlanta.
Look, I'm not a Davis hater, I just think the Hall of Fame is reserved for the greatest to ever play the game, and objectively, I don't see how you can classify Davis as one of the greatest when his greatness lasted only about half of other hall of fame running backs.
I'll just leave you with the career stats of a recent Hall of Fame running back that makes all three of these guys look like total pussies.